EU Parliament To Sue Commission Over Unfreezing Of Hungary’s Funds
The European Parliament is set on suing the European Commission due to its choice to unfreeze billions in funds for Hungary last year, a decision viewed as rather controversial.
Last Monday the Parliament’s legal affairs committee voted to take the Commission to court for not upholding its duties to protect taxpayer money from being fraudulently used. The vote resulted in 16 members in favour, with one member opposing.
The issue arose when the Commission unblocked €10.2 billion in EU funds set aside for Budapest which had been frozen due to human rights concerns.
The funds were blocked as a result of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s threats to block aid to Ukraine at an EU summit. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s choice to unfreeze the funds was not viewed so positively by MEPs, who stated she was giving in to Orbán’s blackmail.
“We believe we have a solid case, as the Commission has contradicted itself on whether Hungary is respecting the rule of law,” MEP Daniel Freund told Playbook.
The decision to sue the Commission is none other than “a sign to the Commission president that the rule of law can’t be traded for deals with Orbán,” claimed Freund.
Political group leaders are set to meet Thursday to give the final green light to President Roberta Metsola to take the Commission to court before a March 25 deadline. Along with the leaders of the S&D, Greens, Left and liberals, EPP leader Manfred Weber will vote in favor of the move, officials told Playbook.
This action was co-financed by the European Union in the frame of the European Parliament’s grant programme in the field of communication. The European Parliament was not involved in its preparation and is, in no case, responsible for or bound by the information or opinions expressed in the context of this action. In accordance with applicable law, the authors, interviewed people, publishers or programme broadcasters are solely responsible. The European Parliament can also not be held liable for direct or indirect damage that may result from the implementation of the action.
Do you agree with the Parliament’s decision?