Watch: PBS To Appeal EBU’s Ban On KANT, Calling It ‘Censorship Of The Maltese Language’
The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) has faced heavy criticism after censoring the word ‘KANT’ from Malta’s Eurovision Song Contest entry due to its phonetic resemblance to an offensive English word.
The decision has not been well received by both local and international Eurovision fans, who have taken to social media to express their frustration, calling the move unjust and discriminatory against the Maltese language.
Many argue given that ‘kant’ is a legitimate Maltese word meaning ‘singing’ and should not be censored based on phonetics alone.
View this post on Instagram
Speaking to TVMNews, Keith Chetcuti, the Executive Head of Public Broadcasting Services (PBS), confirmed that discussions are currently underway to appeal the EBU’s decision and ensure that the song chosen by the Maltese public remains Malta’s entry for Eurovision.
Chetcuti also revealed that PBS is in talks with the singer and songwriters to explore the possibility of making minor changes to the song that would make it acceptable to the EBU, without altering its core identity.
“We feel this decision is discriminatory against the Maltese language because it is the only word in the song that has been censored,” he said, emphasising that PBS remains firm in its stance that the winning song should be the one to represent Malta.
Do you think the EBU’s decision was justified, or should ‘KANT’ remain unchanged?
Footage via TVMnews
READ NEXT: 'Whatever They Throw At Us, Let's Serve Some Kant': Culture Minister Reacts To Malta's Eurovision Ban
