Gerrymandering? Is Labour Trying To Redraw Lines Of PN Districts Ahead Of 2027 Election?
Malta’s electoral map is poised for a significant shake-up ahead of the 2027 general election, with leaked proposals revealing plans to split Birkirkara and Marsaskala, reunify Żebbuġ, and introduce major changes in Naxxar. These boundary adjustments could reshape voting patterns and alter the dynamics of several districts, impacting MPs and party strategies alike. In Malta’s electoral system, where power is determined by the number of seats won rather than the overall vote share, any shift in district boundaries carries potentially far-reaching consequences.
Among the most notable changes, 1,113 Fleur de Lys residents and an additional 3,000 Birkirkara voters will join the first district, which also includes Ħamrun, Valletta, and Floriana. Meanwhile, Pietà will be transferred to the ninth district, grouping it with Msida, San Ġwann, Swieqi, and others. Marsaskala will see a smaller adjustment, with part of its population shifted from the third district to the second, while the portion of Żebbuġ currently in the sixth district will be absorbed into the seventh. Naxxar, however, will undergo the most significant transformation, affecting thousands of voters and potentially altering the composition of the district.
The majority of voter movements appear to be concentrated in PN-leaning districts, which raises questions about the broader implications of these changes.
View this post on Instagram
Why Boundaries Matter
Malta’s Single Transferable Vote (STV) system means that electoral outcomes hinge on seat distribution rather than the national vote share. If a party secures more than 50% of the vote but falls short of a majority of seats, bonus seats are granted to ensure a parliamentary majority. This system makes district boundaries the real electoral battleground.
The mechanics of the STV system, with its redistribution of surplus votes and elimination of candidates in later rounds, mean that even small shifts in voter distribution can have a decisive impact. Each district has a fixed number of seats, and winning a seat requires achieving a quota—the minimum number of votes needed. Surplus votes from candidates exceeding the quota are redistributed, often benefiting their party, while those falling short risk elimination. These dynamics make strategic redistricting a powerful tool, as even minor changes to boundaries can tilt the scales in tightly contested districts.
Voter Movement: Who’s Going Where?
The proposed boundary changes reveal intriguing trends in voter redistribution. 5,407 voters are being shifted from Labour-majority districts to PN-majority ones, while 4,289 voters are moving in the opposite direction. Additionally, 2,574 voters will be redistributed within Labour-majority districts, and a substantial 11,710 voters are being shifted within PN-majority areas.
Although the overall movements may appear balanced, the disproportionately high volume of changes within PN strongholds raises concerns about whether this could dilute the party’s influence in these districts. A closer look suggests that such shifts could subtly impact the ability of PN to secure critical seats in the next election.
Is it Gerrymandering?
Is there a clear smoking gun? Not quite—but it’s safe to assume that no political party would willingly make changes that put it at a disadvantage. Malta’s Constitution mandates that electoral districts must, as nearly as practicable, have an equal number of registered voters, allowing for a ±5% deviation from the national average. On paper, this appears fair. However, the law likely didn’t anticipate the level of data sophistication political parties now wield, including databases tracking voter addresses and political affiliations.
By overloading opposition-leaning districts with more voters than necessary, their influence is diluted as the same number of seats represents a larger electorate. Conversely, underpopulating government-leaning districts ensures votes are more efficient, carrying more weight. Splitting strongholds of opposition support across multiple districts further weakens their chances of securing seats.
While these methods remain within the bounds of the law, they raise valid concerns about whether the redistricting process prioritises fairness or political advantage. A more transparent and independent boundary review process is urgently needed to safeguard the principle of equal representation and prevent partisan interests from taking precedence.
Although these changes do not appear to overwhelmingly favour one party, the concentration of adjustments in PN-majority districts suggests a possible effort to dilute opposition support ahead of 2027. Redistricting, whether intentional or not, underscores the immense power boundaries hold in shaping electoral outcomes.
READ NEXT: Watch: PN MP Sits Out Of Holocaust Remembrance Event In Solidarity With Palestine
