‘All That Is Right In Crete Is Wrong In Malta’: Philanthropist Shares Comparative Insight Between The Islands
Sabine Agius Cabourdin, a renowned laywer, philanthropist and Founder of the FIDEM Charity Foundation, recently drew comparisons between Crete and Malta, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable practices and preservation of cultural heritage in Malta.
Through a thought-provoking comparison with the Greek island of Crete, she shed light on the substantial disparities between the two islands and suggested reform.
“All that is right there is all that is wrong in Malta,” Cabourdin observed, immediately illustrating the critical contrasts between the two islands’ societal landscapes.
She began by highlighting the significant differences in population density, the execution of tourism strategies, and the preservation of local culture.
“Let’s start with some basics: Crete, 8450 km squared – 670, 000 inhabitants, Malta 246 km squared – 535,000 inhabitants.”
Crete, with its well-managed resorts, excellent food and service, and authenticity, stood in sharp contrast to Malta’s current state.
“One is served by Greeks making one’s holiday all the more authentic,” Cabourdin remarked, emphasising the rarity of finding Maltese service providers in Malta’s hospitality sector.
She also noted Crete’s success in agricultural production. High-quality wines, honey, olive oil, and cheeses were commended as testament to Cretans’ prowess in maximising their agricultural potential.
“The villages and seaside resorts are raw and pristine.Because land is vast and Cretans take pride in their workmanship, whatever that may be, new builds and villas don’t offend and blend perfectly with the natural environment and habitat. Greek Architects and designers are proud of their island and ensure Crete remains one of their shining jewels.”
The Greek island’s pristine villages and seaside resorts, she noted, seamlessly blended modern developments with the natural environment – an aspect she suggests Malta could emulate.
She also expressed her concern over Malta’s decline, especially with the ongoing power cuts leading to severe consequences, including fatal heat exhaustion incidents among the elderly.
Criticising the Maltese government for its short-sighted economic strategies, which she believes are based purely on the construction industry, she noted that overpopulation, pollution, and lack of long-term planning have resulted from this unsustainable approach, leading to Malta’s current predicament.
“Our situation is far far worse than a third world country for they never had it. We once had it, Malta was once the envy of the world, tourists would fly in from the four corners of the world to appreciate our priceless history and culture, pristine beaches and our untainted villages built by our forefathers.”
“Our government took this away. Our government got elected first time round mainly due to a false premise that we would be the envy of the world when it came to power supply.”
“Not only did the government not deliver upon their promise, corrupt ministers and individuals raked millions through dodgy back room deals, commissions and “consultancies “. If this is not injustice and a travesty to any democracy, then I don’t know what is.”
“Well done government of Malta and special thanks to Joseph Muscat and his buddies for whoring Malta to the point of bleeding. I don’t think we can ever get Malta out of this brothel,” she strongly said.
“I don’t think any change in administration can ever get back what we lost. I’m sad to say we’re beyond redemption but hope is last to die and I do hope I’m wrong.”
By drawing inspiration from Crete’s success in maintaining its cultural heritage and executing sustainable practices, she proposed that a similar approach could serve the people of Malta better.
What do you make of these strong comparisons?